fzzzp asked:
the thing about the venus of villendorf as a self-portrait-visual-distortion thing is like. It's a cool idea i guess. (though i feel like its kind of relying on assuming that the artist wouldn't have some understanding of how perspective works. Like you don't need to be able to scientifically explain the refraction of light to understand that things look different from different angles) My big issue with it is that it often seems like people are using it as a reason to say "Oh it's okay, she wasn't really fat" because we're a bit wedded to this idea of this heightened primitive era when everyone was super sexy and toned, with the unspoken inference that fat people (whether with lipoedema or just generally fat) are purely a product of the current (fallen) age.
Point is - it's okay if she was fat! Maybe she was fat and that's okay! Maybe that was something the artist wanted to celebrate, because it had a cultural significance, or was considered desirable, or maybe that waa just a person that existed and the artist portrayed them as they were. I think if we keep bringing up the visual distortion thing, it's fair to ask why we're so eager to disprove the possibility that fat people existed in the past, or that anyone might want to preserve the image of a fat person.
yeah! nothing else to add, you nailed it.








